“Whether you think the decision was justified or not, many people are understandably uncomfortable with the idea that tech companies have the power to ban elected leaders. Many private companies like Facebook shouldn’t be making these big decisions themselves. We agree, “Nick Clegg, vice president of global affairs and communications for Facebook, written in a blog post. “It would be better if these decisions were made within frameworks agreed upon by democratically accountable lawmakers. But in the absence of such laws, there are decisions we cannot avoid.”
The oversight committee accepted the case. Facebook will have to respect his decision. “The Board was created to deal with exactly these kinds of issues,” the Supervisory Board said. in a report. “We provide critical independent oversight over Facebook decisions which have enormous implications for global human rights and freedom of expression. This matter is important to people in the United States and around the world. “
A panel of five members of the Supervisory Board will assess whether the content that led to Trump’s ban violated Facebook’s rules and values. “They will also examine whether the removal of content by Facebook has complied with international human rights standards, including freedom of expression and other human rights,” the Supervisory Board said. Once the committee has shared its findings with all board members, a majority of them will need to approve the decision before it becomes final.